Share the essentials
Start with your level, subject, word count, deadline and what you want reviewed.
WiseReview / Academic feedback
See your draft
through a clearer lens.
A structured review service inspired by the MarkIQ approach: assessment criteria, learning outcomes and practical revision guidance in one report.
Feedback that shows
your next move.
WiseReview is designed as a requested review service. You share your draft, brief and rubric through an agreed contact route, then receive a scoped review. This static website demonstrates the report format; it does not automatically grade or analyse uploaded documents.
- Rubric and learning-outcome mapping
- Strengths, gaps and unsupported claims
- Awkward phrasing and unclear sentences
- Referencing and source-verification flags
- Priority actions for your next revision
WiseReviewSample only
Understand the feedback.
Improve the draft.
Learning outcomesMapped
Evidence qualityNeeds attention
Next stepsPrioritised
Review principle
Every recommendation should connect to a criterion, a passage or a concrete gap.
Inside the report
Choose a view of the sample feedback.
| Criterion | Illustrative observation | Recommended next step |
|---|---|---|
| Critical analysis | The draft describes two models but does not compare their explanatory value. | Use the same case evidence to test both models and justify your preferred explanation. |
| Use of evidence | A key claim relies on one older source. | Check for relevant current research and evaluate whether the claim still holds. |
| Coherence | Recommendations introduce a new issue. | Link each recommendation to a finding already established in the discussion. |
Specific comments, useful decisions.
Unclear phrase: “This proves all customers prefer online channels.”
Review comment: The claim is broader than the sample supports. Identify the participants, context and limits before drawing a conclusion.
Source flag: A cited article is missing from the reference list. Locate the original and verify its details; do not infer publication information.
- First: close gaps in the learning outcomes and answer the whole question.
- Next: strengthen evidence and compare alternative explanations.
- Then: improve structure, transitions and paragraph focus.
- Finally: proofread and check references against the required style.
All sample feedback is fictional and demonstrates format, not a real student assessment.
A responsible interpretation
Useful indicators. Honest limits.
Grade guidance
An indicative grade band can be discussed where a complete rubric and suitable draft are available. It is a reasoned estimate, not a university mark or a guarantee. Requirements and marking conventions vary.
AI and similarity
Writing patterns can prompt a conversation about clarity and source use, but cannot prove AI authorship. This site does not provide an AI-detection percentage or access to Turnitin. Any third-party report must be legitimately obtained and interpreted in context.
How to request a review
Bring the context with the draft.
Confirm scope
Agree the criteria, output format, turnaround and quote. Ask about a follow-up review if needed.
Revise with purpose
Work through the priority actions and check every change against your own evidence and brief.